Grind City Media’s Lang Whitaker and Michael Wallace have been covering the NBA
since shorts were short and socks were long, but their opinions about the League
don’t always mesh. #IMHO is their weekly chance to weigh in on the most
pertinent news from around the NBA. What’s lit? What’s lame? Find out each week
right here.
From: Lang Whitaker Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 10:42 AM To: Michael Wallace
Subject: #IMHO
Well, it’s not like we didn’t see it coming.
On Saturday evening the New Orleans Pelicans traded the best player in franchise
history, sending Anthony Davis to the Los Angeles Lakers. Usually it’s a pretty
big deal when you move the greatest player your franchise has ever had, a guy
who’s a top five player in the league. But this felt sorta inevitable, since
people have been talking about it for a while, after all.
But what was a surprise, at least to me, was the haul that David Griffin managed
to extract from the Lakers. Not only did they get Brandon Ingram, who was one of
the best young players in the league last season, but they also got Lonzo Ball,
and Josh Hart, and a top four draft pick, and some more first round picks, and
the rights to swap other picks. It was, at least to me, the biggest trade haul
since Ricky Williams went to the Saints. Which didn’t work out so well.
In your mind, who won this trade? Sure, the Lakers gave up a lot, but they got
AD, who could be the best player in the league, and they can partner him with
LeBron. But this roster is perilously thin otherwise, and we saw what happened a
year ago when they had a thin roster and tried to fill that out with outcast
vets. And the Pels now will have Zion and Lonzo and Ingram and Jrue and a top
four pick that they could flip for veteran depth, which seems like a competitive
team in the suddenly wide-open Western Conference.
Mike, who won this trade?
From: Michael Wallace Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 2:10 PM To: Lang Whitaker
Subject: RE: #IMHO
As much as I’d like to avoid taking the easy route and saying that both teams
won this trade, I do believe both teams won this trade. Both teams can feel like
they walked away with a franchise-altering haul that sets them up to do some
major things in the next five seasons.
Landing Anthony Davis puts the Lakers firmly in the title discussion out West,
especially with Kevin Durant and Klay Thompson being sidelined for most or all
of next season in Golden State and with the Houston Rockets being unstable at
the moment. The fact that the Lakers made this trade and still have a max salary
slot is amazing. So imagine filling out that core with a Jimmy Butler or Kemba
Walker or Kyrie Irving joining LeBron and AD? You’d still have the tax-payer
midlevel to land a fourth solid contributor. Plus, you’ve got all kind of vets
who would line up for the chance to play on minimum deals to help bolster that
squad in L.A.
And then New Orleans has their core set for nearly the next decade if all goes
well. Zion, Ingram, Ball plus plenty of cap space and plenty of draft picks and
plenty of options moving forward. Wow. The Pelicans could easily be back in the
playoff picture in the West within two seasons, if not sooner. This team won’t
reach its peak until after the Warriors are on the decline and the Lakers have
gone as far as they can go in the LeBron era of the franchise. I see them in a
similar spot as OKC was a decade ago when they had all that young talent
together around Durant, Russell Westbrook and James Harden and eventually got to
the 2012 Finals. New Orleans won. And the Lakers won. It’s all relative.
Lang, it’s NBA Draft day. Seems like everyone throughout the lottery either is
or has been connected with a major trade – either involving current players or
tonight’s draft picks. More than half of the 14 players could be picked tonight
by teams that will almost immediately ship them to other teams in the coming
days. So beyond Zion Williamson (Pelicans) and Ja Morant (Grizzlies) presumably
locks to stay with teams that pick them, who is the next bet fit to stick for a
specific lottery team?
From: Lang Whitaker Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 2:53 PM To: Michael Wallace
Subject: RE: #IMHO
Well, we can agree to disagree on that trade, Mike. Two teams can’t win – that’s
what great about sports, there’s a winner and a loser. And I think the Lakers
lost this trade. But only time will tell.
As to your question, I think Coby White might be a really good fit for the Suns,
if that’s where he ends up. He’s not an elite passer like a Ja Morant, but he’s
tall and athletic and can score, and he’d give that Suns team another important
piece that they can count upon as they move forward. The other player I really
like toward the bottom of the lottery is Gonzaga’s Rui Hachimora, who has the
size and strength to contribute right away. If he ends up with a franchise like
the Miami Heat, where they can develop him to fit their system, he could have a
very bright future ahead of him.
I know you made it up to the T-Dot for a few games during the NBA Finals, and it
was cool to see the city finally get rewarded with a title after fervently
supporting their team for so many years. Even our guy Marc seemed to get lit
during the victory parade. But what happens now? Does Kawhi stay and eventually
run for Prime Minister? Or as I saw posited on Twitter, is Kawhi the NBA’s
version of Mary Poppins, showing up in a new city every few years to show teams
how to win and then moving on to a new locale?
From: Michael Wallace Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 3:13 PM To: Lang Whitaker
Subject: RE: #IMHO
Yes, yes, now that I think about it, there does seem to be a bit of a Deion
Sanders quality to Kawhi. Remember how ‘Prime Time’ kept moving around, starting
with the Falcons and ultimately on title-contending teams with the 49ers and
Cowboys in the NFL? Well, that could be Kawhi by the time he’s done.
If he truly wants to end up back in his hometown of L.A., I can’t fault him for
doing so. The Clippers are serious about building a serious contender and are
being run the right way at the front-office and coaching staff level. They will
always be the Lakers’ step-brother in terms of market brand and
deeply-established fan roots. But they are no longer the clearly inferior team
when it comes to production on the court over the past decade. That said, Kawhi
will be walking away from a great international city in Toronto and a franchise
that is currently set up to be an elite team in the East for at least the next
few years. With Kawhi in tow, there’s no way the Raptors shouldn’t be favored to
emerge from the East again as long as he’s there.
Lang, let’s wrap up on this: I’ve done the research and was surprised by what I
found. Usually, either the No. 1 overall pick is great and No. 2 is so-so, or
it’s the other way around. It’s very, very rare that both top two picks in the
same draft are dynamic and awesome and become superstars. Just go back and
check. I think Zion and Ja have a legit shot to be the best top-two draft tandem
in a few decades, possibly going back to 1996 when Allen Iverson and Marcus
Camby went first and second. That’s a long time ago. Am I completely out of my
mind here on this?
From: Lang Whitaker Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 7:48 PM To: Michael Wallace
Subject: RE: #IMHO
To be honest, there haven’t been a lot of knockout number two picks. As my buddy
Tom Haberstroh reported for NBC Sports since the Grizz drafted Hasheem Thabeet
in the two spot back in 2009, the second overall picks have historically been
kinda bad, at least relative to the other lottery picks. From Derrick Williams
to Michael Kidd-Gilchrist, and going back even further from Darko Milicic to
Marvin Williams, there have been several second selections that never quite
lived up to the hype.
The Curse Of The No. 2 PickThe only lottery pick slot has had worse returns over
the last 10 years than the No. 2 pickLatest #BIGNumber:
pic.twitter.com/AR2C5j5Qyb
But there’s hope! Because if you look over the last few years, that second
choice success rate skyrockets. Lonzo Ball, Brandon Ingram and D’Angelo Russell
were each number two picks, so perhaps with better scouting has come better
success rates? Or at least we can hope for the Grizzlies.
As to your question, you might be right? The only top two tandem I could think
of that had a better run were a few years earlier, when Alonzo Mourning and Shaq
went one and two in 1992. For our sake, let’s hope this year’s draft sets a new
standard.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or endorsed by the Memphis
Grizzlies. All opinions expressed by Lang Whitaker and Michael Wallace are
solely their own and do not reflect the opinions of the Memphis Grizzlies or its
Basketball Operations staff, owners, parent companies, partners or sponsors.
Their sources are not known to the Memphis Grizzlies and they have no special
access to information beyond the access and privileges that go along with being
an NBA accredited member of the media.
Media Content:
https://www.nba.com/grizzlies/news/grind-city-media/imho-ad-the-lakers-and-the-nb
a-draft-190620
Media Keywords: NBA, Sports, Memphis Grizzlies, Memphis Grizzlies
Media Thumbnail:
https://www.nba.com/grizzlies/sites/grizzlies/files/190620-imho-anthony-davis-nol
a-main-1554×884.jpg
Taxonomy: #IMHO, Grind City Media, Lang Whitaker, Michael Wallace
Story Link:
https://www.nba.com/grizzlies/news/grind-city-media/imho-ad-the-lakers-and-the-nb
a-draft-190620
